Elizabeth Holmes’ Prison Sentence Quietly Reduced by Two Years, as is Theranos CEO’s

Disgraced Theranos co-founder Elizabeth Holmes’ prison sentence has been reduced by two years, according to the Bureau of Prisons records. Holmes was sentenced to 11 years and three months in prison for defrauding investors by claiming her blood-testing company provided quick and reliable results but she was found to have lied about the reliability of those tests.

Holmes surrendered to the Bureau of Prisons in California on May 30 to serve out her sentence at a minimum-security all-female federal prison camp in Bryan, Texas. Less than two months after she reported to prison, her sentence was quietly changed, with her new release date scheduled for December 29, 2032, the Bureau’s site says. The Bureau has not provided additional information for why Holmes’ projected release date was shortened, but its site says an inmate’s good behavior, substance abuse program completion, and time credits they receive for activities and programs they’ve completed can result in a lessened sentence.

Only last month, Theranos’ former president and chief operating officer Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani’s 13-year sentence was likewise reduced by two years, making his new projected release date April 11, 2034.

[…]

Holmes’s reduced sentence appears to be the latest in a string of leniencies granted to her by the court system including being allowed to remain at her California estate while she appealed her prison sentence, rather than waiting behind bars.

Theranos collapsed in 2018 after an explosive investigative piece by the Wall Street Journal revealed that Holmes had made false claims that the blood-testing technology was accurate.

[…]

Source: Elizabeth Holmes’ Prison Sentence Quietly Reduced by Two Years

That this scumbag can be released at all is incredible.

Amazon claims it isn’t a “Very Large Online Platform” to evade EU rules

Amazon doesn’t want to comply with Europe’s Digital Services Act, and to avoid the rules the company is arguing that it doesn’t meet the definition of a Very Large Online Platform under EU law. Amazon filed an appeal at the EU General Court to challenge the European Commission decision that Amazon meets the criteria and must comply with the new regulations.

“We agree with the EC’s objective and are committed to protecting customers from illegal products and content, but Amazon doesn’t fit this description of a ‘Very Large Online Platform’ (VLOP) under the DSA and therefore should not be designated as such,” Amazon said in a statement provided to Ars today.

[…]

Amazon argued that the new law is supposed to “address systemic risks posed by very large companies with advertising as their primary revenue and that distribute speech and information,” and not businesses that are primarily retail-based. “The vast majority of our revenue comes from our retail business,” Amazon said.

Amazon claims to be “unfairly singled out”

Amazon also claims it’s unfair that some retailers with larger businesses in individual countries weren’t on the list of 19 companies that must comply with the Digital Services Act. The rules only designate platforms with over 45 million active users in the EU as of February 17.

Amazon said it is “not the largest retailer in any of the EU countries where we operate, and none of these largest retailers in each European country has been designated as a VLOP. If the VLOP designation were to be applied to Amazon and not to other large retailers across the EU, Amazon would be unfairly singled out and forced to meet onerous administrative obligations that don’t benefit EU consumers.”

Those other companies Amazon referred to include Poland’s Allegro or the Dutch Bol.com, according to a Bloomberg report. Neither of those platforms appears to have at least 45 million active users.

[…]

In April, Europe announced its designation of 19 large online platforms, which are mostly US-based companies. Five are run by Google, specifically YouTube, Google Search, the Google Play app and digital media store, Google Maps, and Google Shopping. Meta-owned Facebook and Instagram are on the list, as are Amazon’s online store, Apple’s App Store, Microsoft’s Bing search engine, TikTok, Twitter, and Wikipedia.

Listed platforms also include Alibaba AliExpress, Booking.com, LinkedIn, Pinterest, and Snapchat. The other platform is German online retailer Zalando, which was the first company to sue the EC in an attempt to get removed from the list.

Companies have until August 25 to comply and could face fines of up to 6 percent of their annual revenue if they don’t. Companies will have to submit annual risk assessments and risk mitigation plans that are subject to independent audits and oversight by the European Commission.

“Platforms will have to identify, analyze and mitigate a wide array of systemic risks ranging from how illegal content and disinformation can be amplified on their services, to the impact on the freedom of expression and media freedom,” the EC said in April. “Similarly, specific risks around gender-based violence online and the protection of minors online and their mental health must be assessed and mitigated.” One new rule bans advertisements that target users based on sensitive data such as ethnic origin, political opinions, or sexual orientation.

The EC also said that users must be given “clear information on why they are recommended certain information and will have the right to opt-out from recommendation systems based on profiling.” Users must have the ability “to report illegal content easily and platforms have to process such reports diligently.” Amazon and the other platforms must also “provide an easily understandable, plain-language summary of their terms and conditions, in the languages of the Member States where they operate.”

[…]

 

Source: Amazon claims it isn’t a “Very Large Online Platform” to evade EU rules | Ars Technica

Poor poor Amazon – the spy company monopolist marketplace that rips off the retailers in it’s own market!

Mom pleads guilty to abortion after Meta gives DMs to cops – 2023 and these are the witch hunts we see in the land of the free, USA

A Nebraska mother pleaded guilty on Friday to giving her 17-year-old daughter pills for an abortion last year and to helping her dispose of the 29-week-old fetus.

Jessica Burgess, 42, in a plea agreement admitted providing an abortion to her daughter Celeste after 20 weeks of pregnancy, false reporting, and tampering with human remains, according to the Associated Press. Two of the charges are felonies, one is a misdemeanor.

Burgess last August pleaded not guilty to five criminal charges. As part of the plea agreement, the State of Nebraska dropped two of them: concealing the death of a person, and abortion by a person who is not a licensed physician. She is scheduled to be sentenced in September.

The Burgess case began in April 2022 when a Norfolk Police detective began investigating “concerns” – a tip – that the daughter had a stillbirth and had enlisted the help of her mother to dispose of the fetus.

Norfolk Police detective Ben McBride in an affidavit [PDF] describes obtaining the medical records of the women, interviewing them, and obtaining a search warrant to gain access to the women’s Meta/Facebook account data, based on knowledge of a relevant Facebook Messenger discussion.

The messages obtained discuss taking the pills and plans to burn the fetus.

Meta did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Last August, after the charges were first filed, Meta issued a statement saying that it had responded to valid legal warrants related to the “alleged illegal burning and burial of a stillborn infant.”

“The warrants did not mention abortion at all,” the company said.

[…]

Source: Mom pleads guilty to abortion after Meta gives DMs to cops • The Register