researchers recorded the brain activity of mice staring at images and used the data to help make computer vision models more robust against adversarial attacks.

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) used for object recognition in images are all susceptible to adversarial examples. These inputs have been tweaked in some way, whether its adding random noise or changing a few pixels here or there, that forces a model to incorrectly recognize an object. Adversarial attacks cause these systems to mistake an image of a banana for a toaster, or a toy turtle for a rifle.

[…]

, a group of researchers led by Baylor College of Medicine, Texas, have turned to mice for inspiration, according to a paper released on arXiv.

“We presented natural images to mice and measured the responses of thousands of neurons from cortical visual areas,” they wrote.

“Next, we denoised the notoriously variable neural activity using strong predictive models trained on this large corpus of responses from the mouse visual system, and calculated the representational similarity for millions of pairs of images from the model’s predictions.”

As you can tell the paper is pretty jargony. In simple terms, the researchers recorded the brain activity of the mice staring at thousands of images and used that data to build a similar computational system that models that activity. To make sure the mice were looking at the image, they were “head-fixed” and put on a treadmill.

[…]

When the CNN was tasked with classifying a different set of images that were not presented to the mice, its accuracy was comparable to a ResNet-18 model that had not been regularized. But as the researchers began adding random noise to those images, the performance of the unregularized models dropped more drastically compared to the regularized version.

“We observed that the CNN model becomes more robust to random noise when neural regularization is used,” the paper said. In other words, the mice-hardened ResNet-18 model is less likely to be fooled by adversarial examples if it contains features that have been borrowed by real biological mouse brains.

The researchers believe that incorporating these “brain-like representations” into machine learning models could help them reach “human-like performance” one day. But although the results seem promising, the researchers have no idea how it really works.

“While our results indeed show the benefit of adopting more brain-like representation in visual processing, it is however unclear which aspects of neural representation make it work. We think that it is the most important question and we need to understand the principle behind it,” they concluded

Source: Boffins harnessed the brain power of mice to build AI models that can’t be fooled • The Register

Algorithms identified death notices in old newspaper pages, then another set of algorithms pulled names and other key details into a searchable database. From a report: Ancestry used artificial intelligence to extract obituary details hidden in a half-billion digitized newspaper pages dating back to 1690, data invaluable for customers building their family trees. The family history and consumer-genomics company, based in Lehi, Utah, began the project in late 2017 and introduced the new functionality last month. Through its subsidiary Newspapers.com, the company had a trove of newspaper pages, including obituaries — but it said that manually finding and importing those death notices to Ancestry.com in a form that was usable for customers would likely have taken years. Instead, Ancestry tasked its 24-person data-science team with having technology pinpoint and make sense of the data. The team trained machine-learning algorithms to recognize obituary content in those 525 million newspaper pages. It then trained another set of algorithms to detect and index key facts from the obituaries, such as names of the deceased’s spouse and children, birth dates, birthplaces and more.

Ancestry, which has about 3.5 million subscribers, now offers about 262 million obituaries, up from roughly 40 million two years ago. Its database includes about a billion names associated with obituaries, including names of the deceased and their relatives. Besides analyzing the trove of old newspaper pages, the algorithms were also applied to online obituaries coming into Ancestry’s database, making them more searchable. Before the AI overhaul, the roughly 40 million obituaries on Ancestry.com were searchable only by the name of the deceased. That meant a search for “Mary R. Smith,” for instance, would yield obituaries only for people with that name — not other obituaries that mentioned that name as a sibling or child.

Source: Ancestry Taps AI To Sift Through Millions of Obituaries – Slashdot