NASA launches guide to Lunar etiquette now that private operators will share the Moon with governments after US power grab

NASA has laid out a new set of principles that it hopes will inform how states and private companies will interact on the Moon.

The new guidelines, called the Artemis Accords, seek “to create a safe and transparent environment which facilitates exploration, science, and commercial activities for the benefit of humanity”.

The purpose of the Accords appears to be establishing a rough agreement on how space agencies and private companies conduct themselves in space without having to make a formal treaty, which can take decades to come into effect.

“With numerous countries and private sector players conducting missions and operations in cislunar space, it’s critical to establish a common set of principles to govern the civil exploration and use of outer space,” the space agency said.

Some of what the US space agency proposes in the Accords is already covered in previously established frameworks. For example, the Outer Space Treaty of 1967 mandates that space be used for peaceful purposes and prohibits testing and placing weapons of mass destruction on the Moon and other celestial bodies.

The new agreement reiterates this: “International cooperation on Artemis is intended not only to bolster space exploration but to enhance peaceful relationships between nations. Therefore, at the core of the Artemis Accords is the requirement that all activities will be conducted for peaceful purposes, per the tenets of the Outer Space Treaty.”

But although the Outer Space Treaty says nations cannot claim or own property in space, it does not directly address newer space activities such as lunar and asteroid mining. Many states see the Moon as a key strategic asset in outer space, and several companies, including NASA, have proposed mining rocket fuel from planets and asteroids.

The Accords therefore clarify that space agencies can extract and use resources they find in space. “The ability to utilise resources on the Moon, Mars, and asteroids will be critical to support safe and sustainable space exploration and development,” the guideline reads.

The principle is consistent with an executive order that President Trump signed in April, signalling that the US would pursue a policy to “encourage international support for the public and private recovery and use of resources in outer space.”

The Accords also seek to establish so-called safety zones that would surround future moon bases and prevent “harmful interference” from rival countries or companies operating in close proximity. How the size of these safety zones will be determined was not explained.

Agencies that sign the agreement will be required to publicly share their scientific data and be transparent about their operations, “to ensure that the entire world can benefit from the Artemis journey of exploration and discovery.” They’ll also be required to manage their own orbital rubbish, such as end-of-life spacecrafts. Historic sites, such as the Apollo landing site, would also be protected under the agreement.

But not everybody is happy about the new provisions. Dmitry Rogozin, the head of Russia’s space agency has criticised Washington for excluding Russia from early discussions about the space explorations act. “The principle of invasion is the same, whether it be the Moon or Iraq,” he tweeted.

China, which is pursuing its own space program, told Reuters it was willing to cooperate with all parties on lunar exploration “to make a greater contribution in building a community with [a] shared future for mankind”.

The Artemis program aims to put the first woman and second man on the Moon by 2024. NASA is collaborating with several space agencies on the effort, including Elon Musk’s SpaceX and Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin.

Source: NASA launches guide to Lunar etiquette now that private operators will share the Moon with governments • The Register

New Spectra attack breaks the separation between Wi-Fi and Bluetooth

Called Spectra, this attack works against “combo chips,” specialized chips that handle multiple types of radio wave-based wireless communications, such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, LTE, and others.

“Spectra, a new vulnerability class, relies on the fact that transmissions happen in the same spectrum, and wireless chips need to arbitrate the channel access,” the research team said today in a short abstract detailing an upcoming Black Hat talk.

More particularly, the Spectra attack takes advantage of the coexistence mechanisms that chipset vendors include with their devices. Combo chips use these mechanisms to switch between wireless technologies at a rapid pace.

Researchers say that while these coexistence mechanisms increase performance, they also provide the opportunity to carry out side-channel attacks and allow an attacker to infer details from other wireless technologies the combo chip supports.

[…]

“We specifically analyze Broadcom and Cypress combo chips, which are in hundreds of millions of devices, such as all iPhones, MacBooks, and the Samsung Galaxy S series,” the two said.

[…]

“In general, denial-of-service on spectrum access is possible. The associated packet meta information allows information disclosure, such as extracting Bluetooth keyboard press timings within the Wi-Fi D11 core,” Classen and Gringoli say.

“Moreover, we identify a shared RAM region, which allows code execution via Bluetooth in Wi-Fi. This makes Bluetooth remote code execution attacks equivalent to Wi-Fi remote code execution, thus, tremendously increasing the attack surface.

Source: New Spectra attack breaks the separation between Wi-Fi and Bluetooth | ZDNet

Nextdoor Building Relationships With Law Enforcement whilst racially profiling

Community platform Nextdoor is courting police across the country, creating concerns among civil rights and privacy advocates who worry about possible conflicts of interest, over-reporting of crime, and the platform’s record of racial profiling, per a Thursday report by CityLab.

That effort included an all-expenses-paid meeting in San Francisco with members of Nextdoor’s Public Agencies Advisory Council, which includes community engagement staffers from eight police departments and mayor’s offices, according to CityLab. Other outreach has included enlisting current and former law enforcement officers to promote the app, as well as partnerships with local authorities that enable them to post geo-targeted messages to neighborhoods and receive unofficial reports of suspicious activity through the app. According to CityLab, attendees of the meeting in San Francisco had to sign nondisclosure agreements that could shield information on the partnerships from the public.

[…]

Nextdoor has “crime and safety” functions that allow locals to post unverified information about suspicious activity and suspected crimes, acting as a sort of loosely organized neighborhood self-surveillance system for users. That raises the possibility Nextdoor is facilitating racial profiling and over-policing, especially given its efforts to build relationships with authorities and its booming user base (reportedly past 10 million). During the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, Nextdoor has seen skyrocketing user engagement—an 80 percent increase, founder Prakash Janakiraman told Vanity Fair earlier this month.

“There are compelling reasons for transparency around the activities of public employees in general, but the need for transparency is at its height when it comes to law enforcement agencies,” ACLU Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project staff attorney Freed Wessler told CityLab. “It would be quite troubling to learn that police officers were investigating and arresting people using data from private companies with which they have signed an NDA.”

Nextdoor and its fellow security and safety apps, including Amazon’s Ring doorbell camera platform and the crime-reporting app Citizen, are also implicitly raising fears of widespread crime at a time when national statistics show crime rates have plummeted across the country, Secure Justice executive director and chair of Oakland’s Privacy Advisory Commission Brian Hofer told CityLab. Nextdoor marketing materials, for example, assert that Nextdoor played a role in crime reduction in Sacramento.

Source: Report: Nextdoor Building Relationships With Law Enforcement