AST & Science wants to launch 243 mobile broadband satellites into space used by the A Train – and NASA’s quite worried about crashes into scientific craft

AST & Science, a Texas-based company, has applied for approval to build SpaceMobile, which claims to be the “first and only space-based cellular broadband network to be accessible by standard smartphones.” Its proposed network is under review by the FCC. However, NASA reckons it will heighten the risk of contact between spacecraft within a region that is already crowded.

The space agency is particularly concerned about the gap between 690 and 740km above Earth, an area home to the so-called A-train. The A-train consists of ten spacecraft used to monitor Earth, operated by various groups including NASA, the United States Geological Survey, France’s National Centre for Space Studies, and Japan’s Aerospace Exploration Agency. AST wants to place its satellites across 16 orbital planes at an altitude of 700km, a distance that’s too close for comfort.

“The AST constellation would be essentially collocated with the A-Train if the proposed orbit altitude is chosen,” Samantha Fonder, NASA’s Representative to the Commercial Space Transportation Interagency Group, and a member of its Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate, wrote in a letter [PDF] addressed to the FCC.

What’s more the area is also particularly risky since it contains chunks of debris leftover from a previous orbital crash. “Additionally, this is an orbit regime that has a large debris object density (resulting from the Fengyun1-C ASAT test and the Iridium33-COSMOS 2251collision) and therefore experiences frequent conjunctions with debris objects,” she continued.

Fonder reckons that placing another 243 satellites near the A-train will increase the chances of a space smash. NASA has arrived at that conclusion by taking into account various factors, including the size of the AST’s SpaceMobile birds. They are much bigger than the spacecraft in the A-train and carry 900-square-metre antennas.

Source: FYI: Someone wants to launch mobile broadband satellites into space used by scientific craft – and NASA’s not happy • The Register

Uncle Sam’s legal eagles hope to get their claws on $1bn in Bitcoin ‘stolen by hacker’ from dark-web souk Silk Road

The US Department of Justice on Thursday filed a legal request to formally take control of more than $1bn in Bitcoin (BTC) generated from the sales of illicit goods at Silk Road.

It is believed the crypto-coins were stolen from the dark-web market at some point, and now the Feds want to take ownership of the haul.

Between 2011 and 2013, Silk Road sold a variety of illegal drugs and services online, until it was shut down by US law enforcement. In 2015, the site’s operator, Ross Ulbricht, was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Now the Feds say they have an agreement to get a billion-dollar payday with Bitcoins used on the site.

In that brief period, the site racked up total revenue of more than 9.5m BTC resulting in about 600K BTC of sales commissions, according to the DoJ’s forfeiture filing.

When Ulbricht was arrested in October, 2013, the FBI said it had seized 144,336 BTC from Ulbricht’s hardware, plus 29,655 BTC from a prior seizure, totaling 173,991 BTC, which was worth about $33.6m at the time or about $2.6bn at the current exchange rate.

Prior to that, in May, 2012, according to Tom Robinson, chief scientist and co-founder of cryptocurrency analytics biz Elliptic, about 70,000 BTC left Silk Road’s digital wallet before being moved to a Bitcoin wallet with the address 1HQ3Go3ggs8pFnXuHVHRytPCq5fGG8Hbhx in 2013.

Since then, there have been a few transactions between BTC addresses related to the Silk Road funds that have remained beyond the reach of US authorities. According to a Dept of Justice court filing [PDF] today, law enforcement officers earlier this year worked with a third-party Bitcoin attribution company to analyze unattributed transactions and noticed an unusual pattern among some of them.

“These 54 transactions were not noted in the Silk Road database as a vendor withdrawal or a Silk Road employee withdrawal and therefore appear to represent Bitcoin that was stolen from Silk Road,” the court filing explained, noting that they amounted to 70,411.46 BTC. Worth about $354,000 at the time of the transfers, the value of that digital currency has skyrocketed to over $1bn today.

Investigators managed to link an unidentified individual with these transactions and the Bitcoin wallet identified above that begins 1HQ3.

“According to the investigation, Individual X was able to hack into Silk Road and gain unauthorized and illegal access to Silk Road and thereby steal the illicit cryptocurrency from Silk Road and move it into wallets that Individual X controlled,” the filing claimed. “…Ulbricht became aware of Individual X’s online identity and threatened Individual X for return of the cryptocurrency to Ulbricht.”

The government contends that Individual X failed to return the funds and kept the cryptocurrency without spending it. The complaint goes on to state that on Tuesday, Individual X signed an agreement with the US Attorney’s Office in Northern California to surrender the hacked funds.

Also on Tuesday, the 1HQ3 wallet shows a transfer of 69,369 BTC, worth about $1bn – presumably this represents Individual X providing the government with access to the funds it hopes to formally seize.

The Register has asked the Department of Justice to confirm that it controls the receiving digital wallet but we’ve not heard back.

The DoJ legal filing signals to the court that the government will present evidence that the cited property can be lawfully forfeited. If the court approves the forfeiture, the Feds will officially gain control of the funds

Source: Uncle Sam’s legal eagles hope to get their claws on $1bn in Bitcoin ‘stolen by hacker’ from dark-web souk Silk Road • The Register

Network driver issue shaves 12 more hours off Microsoft’s ‘365’ infrastructure, and yeah, it was Exchange Online again

Traditionally a night for fireworks, 5 November saw some sort of detonation within the Microsoft 365 infrastructure in the form of a borked update or, as the company delicately put it: “an issue wherein some users may be unable to access their mailboxes through Exchange Online via all connection methods.”

There was good news, however, as just over an hour later Microsoft confessed that a recent service update was “causing impact to mailbox access via Exchange Online” but a fix was being prepared that would sort it all out.

The joy was short-lived. Having realised that a network driver issue was to blame, the company then admitted the fix “was taking longer than anticipated.”

Six hours after its initial notification of trouble in the cloud, Microsoft also began looking at alternative options for “faster relief.”

Finally, nearly eight hours after the bad news first dropped from its social media orifice, the software giant claimed a fix was being rolled out. A further four hours was needed before Microsoft trumpeted that everything was up and running once again.

[…]

A glance at social media shows a substantial number of users struggled with the outage, with some making unkind comparisons with arch-rival Gmail and others expressing bewilderment that a driver could cause such an impact. Surely it was tested before hitting production systems?

Oh you sweet summer child. Have you forgotten Windows 10 1809 so soon? We await anxiously the arrival of the rebrandogun. Microsoft 352, anyone?

Source: Network driver issue shaves 12 more hours off Microsoft’s ‘365’ infrastructure, and yeah, it was Exchange Online again • The Register

Yay, cloud