We had sex in a Chinese hotel, then found we had been broadcast to thousands

One night in 2023, Eric was scrolling on a social media channel he regularly browsed for porn. Seconds into a video, he froze.

He realised the couple he was watching – entering the room, setting down their bags, and later, having sex – was himself and his girlfriend. Three weeks earlier, they had spent the night in a hotel in Shenzhen, southern China, unaware that they were not alone.

Their most intimate moments had been captured by a camera hidden in their hotel room, and the footage made available to thousands of strangers who had logged in to the channel Eric himself used to access pornography.

Eric (not his real name) was no longer just a consumer of China’s spy-cam porn industry, but a victim.

Warning: This story contains some offensive language

So-called spy-cam porn has existed in China for at least a decade, despite the fact that producing and distributing porn is illegal in the country.

[…]

Much of the material is advertised on the messaging and social media app Telegram. Over 18 months, I discovered six different websites and apps promoted on Telegram. Between them these claimed to operate more than 180 hotel-room spy-cams which were not just capturing, but livestreaming, hotel guests’ activities.

I monitored one of these websites regularly for seven months and found content captured by 54 different cameras, with about half operational at any one time.

That means thousands of guests could have been filmed over that period, the BBC estimates, based on typical occupancy rates. Most are unlikely to know they have been captured on camera.

Eric, from Hong Kong, began watching secretly filmed videos as a teenager, attracted by how “raw” the footage was.

“What drew me in is the fact that the people don’t know they’re being filmed,” says Eric, now in his 30s. “I think traditional porn feels very staged, very fake.”

But he experienced what it feels like to be at the opposite end of the supply chain when he found the video of himself and his girlfriend “Emily” – and he no longer finds gratification in this content.

[…]

Blue Li, from a Hong Kong-based NGO called RainLily – which helps victims remove explicit secretly-filmed footage from the internet – says demand is rising for her group’s services, but the task is proving more difficult.

Telegram never responds to RainLily’s requests for removal, she says, forcing them to contact group administrators – the very people selling or sharing spy-cam pornography – who have little incentive to respond.

“We believe tech companies share the huge responsibility in addressing these problems. Because these companies are not neutral platforms; their policies shape how the content would be spread,” Li says.

The BBC itself told Telegram, via its report function, that AKA and Brother Chun – and the groups they managed – were sharing spy-cam porn via its platforms, but it did not respond or take any action.

[…]

We formally set out our findings to Brother Chun and AKA that they were profiting from exploiting unsuspecting hotel guests. They did not reply, but hours later the Telegram accounts they used to advertise the content appeared to have been deleted. However the website that AKA sold me access to is still livestreaming hotel guests.

[…]

Source: We had sex in a Chinese hotel, then found we had been broadcast to thousands

Posted in Sex

South Korean Crypto Exchange Bitthumb Accidentally Gave Away $43 Billion Worth of Paper Bitcoin – which it didn’t have. Then just looted accounts to reverse the error.

This is called a bank error in your favour. You are liable to return the money, and you should not spend it or use it. But the bank is not allowed to just grab the money from your account. And here is part of the problem: crypto exchanges are not under the same legal restrictions as banks, which allows them to just access your accounts with relative impunity.

Earlier today, reports surfaced regarding a jaw-dropping clerical error at South Korean crypto exchange Bithumb regarding a promotional reward being sent to some customers. According to some early accounts, the reward was supposed to be 2,000 Korean won, but the users were sent 2,000 bitcoin instead. At current prices, this amounts to a roughly $140 million giveaway. That would be bad. But it was apparently much worse.

Bithumb itself has confirmed the error and indicated 620,000 bitcoin (worth around $43 billion) was accidentally sent to 695 users. The amount was large enough to cause a temporary 10% downtick in the price of bitcoin on the exchange, as some of the customers who received the misallocated funds immediately sold them. According to Bithumb, further damage was avoided by limiting withdrawals and transactions for the affected customers, and 99.7% of the errantly sent bitcoin has been recovered.

“We would like to clarify that this matter has nothing to do with external hacking or security breaches, and there are no problems with system security or customer asset management,” reads a translated version of Bithumb’s post on the matter.

The massive amount of bitcoin handed out to Bithumb customers also brings the concept of “paper bitcoin” to the forefront, as the reality is these exchanges do not necessarily have all of the bitcoin to back the amounts shown to their respective customers. This issue was at the heart of the infamous collapse of early bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox in 2014, which was by far the largest crypto exchange at the time. According to blockchain data provider Arkham Intelligence, Bithumb has roughly $5.3 billion in assets, which is nowhere near the $43 billion it says it errantly awarded to some of its customers.

[…]

Source: South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $43 Billion Worth of Paper Bitcoin

Team USA, Vance Booes Heard through anti-boo technology deployed in Frosty Reception at Italy’s Winter Olympics.

After using this alternate reality type of tool in the Eurovision Song Contest to great shame, IOC organisers tried to lie to the public but this time on a global scale. Unfortunately all the live commentators were talking about the booing whilst it sounded like cheering, until JD Vance appeared and the technology was unable to compensate any longer. There are now Americans who think their local news channels are censoring for them. Why do the organisers feel the need to lie to the public about the reception their audience is giving? It’s patronising and dishonest.

[…] In an unmistakable sign of Europe’s rapidly dimming view on America, the U.S. delegation entered the San Siro stadium here on Friday night to a chorus of boos and disapproving whistles from the international crowd of more than 65,000. The jeering only intensified when Vice President JD Vance appeared on the big screen during Team USA’s arrival. 

The only other team to receive similar treatment was Israel.

Olympic organizers had braced for the possibility of anti-American sentiment inside the stadium. Small protests had already cropped up on the streets of Milan against the planned presence of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in the city. Asked before the Games on how the Americans might be received, IOC president Kirsty Coventry said she hoped that the occasion would be “seen by everyone as an opportunity to be respectful.”

[…]

Friday’s ceremony wasn’t, however, an event that brought every Olympic athlete together. 

For the first time, the official curtain-raising was held across four disparate venues, from the stadium on the edge of Milan to the ski town of Cortina in the Dolomite mountains to smaller sites in Livigno and Predazzo. That meant only part of the 232-strong U.S. delegation heard the Milanese reaction.

[…]

And if anyone thought that this might be a sign of Italy’s distaste for North America at large, the locals made it clear that their beef was specifically with the U.S.

The Italians reserved some of the loudest cheers of the night for Mexico and Canada.

[…]

Source: Team USA, Vance Booed in Frosty Reception at Italy’s Winter Olympics