Why the Google antitrust complaint is not about Microsoft

This is an interesting read:

It’s about the current EU antitrust complaint filed against Google – not by Microsoft, as it happens. It covers whitelisting of people and Google using its search engine results to push its own services, which is anti-competitive. Specifically two examples are mentioned: on line map services (where MapQuest lost out in searches to Google Maps, even when the term MapQuest was specifically used) and price comparison sites. This tactic could obviously be used to kill off any competitors in any market Google is in, especially if they are then whitelisted, whereby the competitor is not to found in the search engine at all any more, unless through paid exposure using AdWords.

So this is about anit-competitiveness and transparency.

Why the Google antitrust complaint is not about Microsoft • The Register.

Dutch fingerprint database supposedly safe in 3rd party hands

The current (demissionary) minister Ernst Hirsch Ballin has made himself a total idiot by declaring a database into which he wants to put fingerprints of all the Netherlands ‘safe’. Hasn’t he learnt yet, when it comes to databases, there is no such thing as safe?!

Further, the data will be stored at a third, non-governmental database. Where it will be safe too.

Really.

Idiot.

Minister: database vingerafdrukken is veilig | Webwereld.

EC wants global filter: claims kiddyporn

That’s how these misused things always start – anti-terrorlaws, jew extermination: no, we just want to do this one little thing. Once the mechanism is in there, well we might just as well increase its functionalities just a little bit – it’s there anyway!

Anyway, the EC wants to implement a technically totally unviable kiddy porn filter over the internet, globally please. Who’s to say it won’t stop midget porn (hey – if you dig it, whatever!) and then get used to stop, say, sites with liberal ideas?

EC stelt Europabreed kinderpornofilter voor | Webwereld.