Patent strike on Google by evil empire

Nortel went bankrupt in 2009. In 2011, it held an auction for its massive patent portfolio. The winners of the auction were Apple, Microsoft, Sony, RIM, and others, who bought the patents for $4.5 billion as a consortium named Rockstar Bidco. 

http://m.slashdot.org/story/193739

Great. They want to stop Google from being a search engine. Patents are really good for innovation. Not.

Call yourself a ‘hacker’, lose your 4th Amendment right against seizures

The court has struggled over the issue of allowing the copying of the hard drive. This is a serious invasion of privacy and is certainly not a standard remedy… The tipping point for the court comes from evidence that the defendants – in their own words – are hackers. By labeling themselves this way, they have essentially announced that they have the necessary computer skills and intent to simultaneously release the code publicly and conceal their role in that act. And concealment likely involves the destruction of evidence on the hard drive of Thuen’s computer. For these reasons, the court finds this is one of the very rare cases that justifies seizure and copying of the hard drive.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/10/23/hacker_loses_4th_amendment_rights_case/

The italics are mine. The definition of a hacker runs more into using things for a purpose they were not originally intended for. This destructive interpretation on the word by the US courts is worrying, because it blankets a huge grouo of people who are furthering technical innovation all over the world.

Given the US track record of handling people they don’t grant rights to, is this the start of an anti-intellectuals pogrom?

U.S. Terrorism Agency Granted Unprecedented Access to Citizens’ Files

Counterterrorism officials wanted to create a government dragnet, sweeping up millions of records about U.S. citizens—even people suspected of no crime.

Not everyone was on board. “This is a sea change in the way that the government interacts with the general public,” Mary Ellen Callahan, chief privacy officer of the Department of Homeland Security, argued in the meeting, according to people familiar with the discussions.

A week later, the attorney general signed the changes into effect.

Wow. They seem to have no oversight at all!

Video – U.S. Terrorism Agency Granted Unprecedented Access to Citizens' Files – WSJ.com.

Piracy and Movie Revenues: Box office sales went down after they closed MegaUpload

Exogenous variation comes from the unexpected shutdown of the popular file hosting platform Megaupload.com on January 19, 2012. The estimation strategy is based on a quasi difference-in-differences approach. We compare box office revenues before and after the shutdown to a matched control group of movies unaffected by the shutdown.

We find that the shutdown had a negative, yet insignificant effect on box office revenues

via Piracy and Movie Revenues: Evidence from Megaupload by Christian Peukert, Jörg Claussen :: SSRN.

Megaupload framed by FBI claims Kim Dotcom

Evidence has emerged showing the Department of Homeland Security served a search warrant on Mr Dotcom’s file-sharing company Megaupload in 2010 which he claims forced it to preserve pirated movies found in an unrelated piracy investigation.

The 39 files were identified during an investigation into the NinjaVideo website, which had used Megaupload’s cloud storage to store pirated movies.

When the FBI applied to seize the Megaupload site in 2012, it said the company had failed to delete pirated content and cited the earlier search warrant against the continued existence of 36 of the same 39 files.

Dotcom: We've hit the jackpot – National – NZ Herald News.

The Biggest New Spying Program You’ve Probably Never Heard Of

The National Counterterrorism Center is now allowed to buy and keep large databases of information on their own nationals, even though they are not suspected of anything. Not only that, but they can share their information with anyone they want.
To top it off, they have no practical form of oversight at all.

The Biggest New Spying Program You’ve Probably Never Heard Of.

UK proposes to allow Google to digitise all copywriten works with no renumeration

Granted, copyright is a fussy subject which stifles innovation and freedom, but copyright holders are entitled to at least /some/ protection, at least for some time!

The UK government is considering a proposal to allow anyone to digitise anything and use the data for commercial purposes unless the creator of the content ‘opts out’ from this proces somehow. The digitiser only has to pay a ‘nominal fee’ (next to nothing) in order to be able to use the content if there is protest.

A deep critique in the link below.

Hargreaves Review: Extended Collective Licensing and Orphan Works « Action on Authors' Rights.

To get into Israel you may have to give your email password

Apparently they profile tourists and then force them to open their email on their own PC (which means basically you’re giving them your email login through a keylogger) and they look into it.
If you disagree you’re hiding something and not allowed into the country.
Besides using profiling, which is innefective, it’s a huge invasion of privacy. Not even the USA goes this far.

Israel steps up email border checks | The Australian.

U.S. Appeals court determines it’s OK to take an employers’ source code

Have they gone nuts? They say that as code isn’t something physical, it can’t have been stolen. So it’s OK to take as much sources from a previous employer and do whatever you want with it.

“He argues that: [1] the source code was not1a “stolen” “good” within the meaning of the National Stolen2Property Act, and [2] the source code was not “related” to a3product “produced for or placed in interstate or foreign4commerce” within the meaning of the Economic Espionage Act.5The judgment of the district court is reversed. Judge6Calabresi concurs in the opinion and has filed an additional7concurring opinion.”

But taking a photograph of a classified document does constitute espionage? Or is that also OK now?

U.S. vs. Sergey Aleynikov, former Goldman Sachs programmer.

International Cryptography Freedom

Since 2000 the US has cracked down hard on cryptography information sharing and it’s hard to find any information on it since around 2001.

There are still a few good sources around.

Piracy.com: International Cryptography Freedom.

Cryptography links outside of North America

C4I.org strong crypto links

Treachery Unlimited

Shmoo

Speak Freely encrypted VOIP

utopia hacktic

uni-hamburg

PGP International

Sunet.se

Semper

It’s incredible how research in cryptography seems to have been wiped out.

Assessing ACTA: Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law

This report concludes that ACTA’s harm greatly exceeds its potential benefits. Given ACTA’s corrosive effect on transparency in international negotiations, the damage to international intellectual property institutions, the exclusion of the majority of the developing world from the ambit of the agreement, the potentially dangerous substantive provisions, and the uncertain benefits in countering counterfeiting, there are ample reasons for the public and politicians to reject the agreement in its current form. In doing so, governments would help restore confidence in the global intellectual property system and open the door to a new round of negotiations premised on transparency, inclusion, and evidence-based policy-making

Michael Geist – Assessing ACTA: My Appearance Before the European Parliament INTA Workshop on ACTA.

NL courts rule ISP’s are content filters – great firewall of NL coming up?

Ziggo and XS4ALL, two ISP’s in NL, have been forced by the courts to dissallow users to get to the pirate bay. Of course, users will still be able to get there using VPNs so it’s not very effective, but more worrying is that the Dutch courts seem to think that not only do they have the right to filter content viewed by Dutch web surfers, but also that the ISP is the right body to act as an internet cop.

Of course, this does set precedence, so expect to see politics and the courts follow their own agenda’s soon and revoke our freedoms for loads of other websites.

Rechtspraak.nl – LJN: BV0549.